Massachusetts Considers De-emphasizing High Stakes Test

Massachusetts Considers De-emphasizing High Stakes Test

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, the first Democratic Governor of Massachusetts in recent memory, has called for an improvement of the state's MCAS (High-Stakes Tests) scores and adding new assessments as well, according to the June 6, 2007, Boston Globe. This new idea--expanding the ways in which high-school students may prove they are worthy of graduation--has led to a proposal and hearings before the state legislature's Joint Committee on Education. Patrick was criticized for this in an editorial in the Boston Herald, the city's conservative inflammatory tabloid-style newspaper, who predictably called it "backsliding" and, ironically, a "concession to mediocrity."

The MCAS, the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System, was passed in the mid-90's and became the state's make or break testing system, as required by the NCLB. In 2003, the MCAS became the state's graduation requirement.

From my experience as an educator in Massachusetts colleges for thirty years, I can testify that in the past five years or so there has been a noticeable shift in freshman students' writing skill: where once there was a wide range of skills--ranging from a percentage of students of extraordinary creativity and imagination and writing abilities to, yes, a percentage of extremely weak students. Now things are much more level--the weak students aren't appearing in the same frequencies as before, and that's good (although it's been documented how weak students are simply forced out of high schools before graduation in order not to bring down aggregate test scores, and thus never even get to apply to a college, so forced attrition may be as much a cause as improved educational practices). But the really exceptional writers are also gone, for the most part, beaten down by school systems teaching to the test and promulgating a mindless essay format known as the "five-paragraph-essay" which guarantees, if mastered, passing the test and never having a creative or useful thought to express. Thanks to the MCAS and other high-stakes test, mediocrity is rampant.

Many critics of the NCLB have been asking for relief from the mindlessness of high-stakes testing. Educators know that all a child is and knows cannot be summed up in a few true/false and multiple-choice tests (to its credit, the MCAS does allow for a student to actually write an essay as part of the test). And requiring students to pass this one test before graduating is harmful to the country. There is no evidence, one way or the other, on how these tests correlate with later success in life. Do those students who pass these tests turn out to be better citizens, better parents, better workers, better soldiers, than those who don't pass them? "Unless we can link scores to some measure of success after leaving school," George Wood has written in
Many Children Left Behind, "they should not be given."

|